News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 A question of councillors: Less is more 

A question of councillors: Less is more

26 Oct, 2009 03:00 AM
EASIER decision making versus a greater voice were some of the issues raised in the councillor numbers debate when the Port News took to the streets last week.

Port Macquarie-Hastings’ nine councillors were sacked over the Glasshouse issue in February last year.

Now, council administrator Garry Payne has floated the idea of reducing councillor numbers and he wants community debate on the concept.

The Local Government Act requires a minimum of five councillors and a referendum would be needed to reduce the councillor contingent in the a new council.

Byabarra’s Carol Randall was involved a campaign in 1995 to get Jacquie Argent, Mavis Barnes and Lisa Intemann elected to the council.

And they were.

Mrs Randall favours keeping the status quo of councillor numbers.

“Everyone needs to be represented on the council and I don’t think five (councillors) are going to do it,” she said.

“That way, you have a better chance of gender and age distribution.”

Sandra Nicholson from Port Macquarie favours five councillors.

More councillors meant more arguments and made it harder to reach a decision, she said.

Josie Sutherland agrees.

The Port Macquarie woman said there were more complications with larger councillor numbers.

Too many arguments stemmed from too many councillors, Merle Kebblewhite of Port Macquarie also said, and she supported reducing the councillor numbers to five.

Dunbogan’s Glenn Bamford also thinks reducing councillor numbers would be a good idea.

“They should all work together if there is only a small number but you would need to ensure representation from the whole of the local government area, through possibly ridings,” he said.

Meanwhile, quick decision making would be an advantage of fewer councillors, Kylie Driver says.

But Simon Ross doesn’t want the councillor ranks to dwindle.

“You need that cross section of opinions and you need to have a decent majority (in voting),” he said.

Sam Spahich from Port Macquarie believes councillors should focus more on youth needs and that is more likely without reducing councillor numbers.

“I think it would be really nice if more people were involved with the town to face some of the issues we have,” he said.

Nikki Rudge of Sancrox is undecided about the councillor number debate but she questioned whether savings from fewer councillors would be put back into the community.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Have the minimum 5 councilors, and set up an online forum on the councils website for discussion topics. This would include polls or surveys (also held through paper and other means) to get the true opinions of the local community. we had 9 councilors before and they had no idea of what the community actually wanted.
Posted by Nick, 26/10/2009 5:12:36 AM, on Port Macquarie News
To the previous poster, I think you have some good ideas and are on the right track; however, an online forum would not be a true representation of the wider community. It would only be representative of those who have access to and knowhow of the internet. It would certainly suit the majority (i.e. 18-50 year olds) but would certainly be hit and miss for those above 50, and very much so for those above 70.
Posted by Amy, 26/10/2009 3:18:10 PM, on Port Macquarie News
Remember that seven of the councillors did agree. If it hadn't been for the two that did not, things could have been far worse. I do not think that five is sufficient for such a large and diverse area.
Posted by Carol, 26/10/2009 5:26:08 PM, on Port Macquarie News
Fewer councillors would mean less representation of a diverse range of opinions. Fewer councillors would also be more effectively lobbied by interest groups and developers. Decisions should be made on merit, not simply by the most expedient method possible. The cost savings of cutting 4 councillors would be negligible compared to the total council staff budget and would not justify the reduction in representation. Nick - you claim 9 councillors didn't represent community views, but you think 5 will? How is that supposed to work? (And here's a tip: you are not "the community".)
Posted by Chris, 27/10/2009 8:50:20 AM, on Port Macquarie News

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles


domain agent advert


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...